Levels of evidence are used to evaluate and rank the authority of particular research methods. While higher levels of evidence are more rigorous with less risk of bias, it is important to consider that some studies are more appropriate for answering particular research questions. The evidence hierarchy is meant as a decision tool to be combined with clinical judgement.
Levels of evidence are often illustrated as a pyramid, with the highest levels at the top (as seen here). However, there are a variety of rating systems available, including but not limited to the Melnyk model and the Hopkins model.
Image: EBM Pyramid and EBM Page Generator, copyright 2006 Trustees of Dartmouth College and Yale University. All Rights Reserved. Produced by Jan Glover, David Izzo, Karen Odato and Lei Wang.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE | STUDY DESIGN |
---|---|
Level I | Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial |
Level II | Randomized controlled trial |
Level III | Non-randomized controlled trial (quasi-experiment) |
Level IV | Case-control or cohort studies |
Level V | Systematic reviews of qualitative or descriptive studies |
Level VI | Qualitative or descriptive studies |
Level VII | Opinion of authorities and/or reports of expert committees |
Adapted from Melnyk, B.M. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). "Box 1.3: Rating system for the hierarchy of evidence for intervention/treatment questions" in Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (3rd ed.) (pp. 11). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.
The JHEBM uses a five-level evidence rating system to appraise evidence, and includes research (Levels 1, 2, and 3) and non research (Levels 4 and 5) evidence. For more information, consult Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals : model and guidelines.
Dang, D., Dearholt, S., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2022). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: model and guidelines. 4th ed. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International
EVIDENCE LEVEL | TYPES OF EVIDENCE |
---|---|
Level I |
|
Level II |
|
Level III |
|
Level IV |
Opinions of respected authorities and/or nationally recognized expert committees or consensus panels based on scientific evidence. Includes:
|
Level V |
Based on experiential and non-research evidence. Includes:
|
Adapted from Hierarchy of Evidence Guide, Appendix D, Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals. © 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing.
© 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing.
WHICH TYPE OF EVIDENCE BEST ANSWERS YOUR CLINICAL QUESTION?
QUESTION | TYPES OF EVIDENCE |
---|---|
All clinical questions | Systematic review, Meta-analysis |
Treatment/Therapy | Randomized controlled trial (Also: Meta-analysis, Cohort study, Case-control study) |
Etiology | Cohort study (Also: RCT, Meta-analysis, Case-control study, Case series) |
Diagnosis | RCT &/or Cohort study (Also: Cross-sectional study) |
Prognosis | Cohort Study &/or Case-control study (Also: Case series) |
Prevention | Prospective study &/or RCT (Also: Cohort study, Case-control study, Case series) |
Meaning | Qualitative study |
Adapted from Finest-Overholt, E. & Johnston, L. (2005). "Table 3 Examples of different types of clinical questions using PICOT format and types of evidence to answer the given question" in Teaching EBP: Asking searchable, answerable clinical questions. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Copyright © 2005 Sigma Theta Tau International